The first thing that Watson & Watson (2011) show is that CBI has not been shown to make a large change in general student achievement. One study evaluated the impact of a variety of math and reading software products, implemented at four different grade levels...across 132 schools in 33 school districts....found no significant difference on student test scores in classrooms using the software as compared to classrooms not using the software (Dynarski et al., 2007). What is interesting is that one of the schools, an alternative high school for disadvantaged youth, found improvements of up to 60% on achievement standards and pass rates on state exit exams ranged up to 85% in English and 100% in math (Watson & Watson, 2011). This kind of improvement from this school is worth looking into, what this research study found was that along with CBI, having a learner-centered culture, learning environment helped these students to be successful.
When students felt they had a voice and some say in what their education was going to look like, they took more interest in what they were learning and why they were learning it (p.46). Students could choose how they would master the content and what tools they would use to master that content. The most popular choice was the Plato CBI and technology projects such as Power Point presentations, brochures and WebQuests. The CBI platform allowed students to engage in an active, self-paced, self-learning planning process (p.46). This perception of freedom allowed students a safe environment to take risks and explore in their own learning.
Because the school had very few resources they relied heavily on the internet to get information to students. As the principal stated:
We don't have textbooks...so a lot of it is internet-based. I find things for them to learn and read on the Internet. It enables us to do a lot of things that we would not be able to do otherwise (p.47).Teachers spoke of the importance of technology to realize the learner-centered, self-paced, instructional choices that were a part of the school culture. Most of these students did not have access to computers outside of school. These students were impressed with computer technology in how it helped them find anything they needed to find. They expressed how they enjoyed the interactive nature of the computers, and how technology provided fun in learning while still helping them to focus on their work (p.48). Some students even mentioned that their first experiences with a computer was in that classroom.
Through the technology that was provided to these disadvantaged youth in this alternative school, in the Midwest of the United States, they were able to achieve what they were unable to in a mainstream high school setting. CBI provided these youth with a pathway to success that otherwise would not have been their for them.
This article shows the important contributions that technology can have on disadvantaged environments to help student achievement. This study does need to be replicated in other areas to test its validity but the findings are strong to show that there is a positive correlation between technology and improving education for disadvantaged youth.